Advice on designing scientific posters
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why a poster is usually better than a talk
Although you could communicate all of the above via a 15-minute talk at the same meeting, presenting a poster allows you to more personally interact with the people who are interested in your research, and can reach people who might not be in your specific field of research. Posters are more efficient than a talk because they can be viewed even while you are off napping, and especially desirable if you are terrible at giving talks. And once you have produced a poster, you can easily take it to other conferences. If you don't like to travel far, or are broke, many college and university science departments sponsor poster sessions that welcome students from nearby institutions. For all of the above, session organizers typically have a "Best Poster Prize Committee," which awards fame and often cold hard cash to deserving posters. And when you're ready to retire your poster from active duty, you can hang it in your dorm room to impress your friends, or display it in your departmental hallway so that faculty can show off your hard work to visitors for years to come. You can also submit your final product to ePosters.net, which promises to keep a PDF version of your poster in perpetuity (for free) and allows people to send you comments about your poster.
Motivational advice
The best general advice I can give a first-time poster constructor is to describe the circumstances in which a poster will eventually be viewed: a hot, congested room filled with people who are there primarily to socialize, not to look at posters. Because poster sessions are often concurrent with the "wine and beer" mixer, chaos is further increased by hundreds of uninhibited graduate students staggering around hitting on each other. It's not a pretty sight.
![]() |
And it gets worse: meeting organizers will invariably sandwich your poster between two posters that are infinitely more entertaining, such as "Teaching house cats to perform cold fusion" and "Mating preferences in extraordinarily adorable red pandas." In such a situation, your poster must be interesting and visually slick if you hope to attract viewers.
![]() |
Choosing and using software
The best programs for designing large-format posters are page layout applications such as QuarkXPress, InDesign (which replaces Pagemaker; <uncontrolled sobbing>), and LaTeX. These programs allow control of text wrapping, text flow among associated text blocks (trust me, this feature is priceless), and much more. But you can also cobble together great posters using graphics packages such as Illustrator, CorelDRAW, Freehand, and Omnigraffle (my current favorite). Poster template files for many of the above programs can be found on the internet by conducting a search in Google for “poster template” and then adding the application name (e.g., Powerpoint). Most of the advice below refers to Powerpoint (because it is generally owned by our students).
The Powerpoint template below (download it, if you like it) is designed for a 36 x 56" poster, but it can be easily modified for other sizes (though Powerpoint restricts page width to no more than 56"). To get started, just replace the "dummy" text and graphics with real content, if you have it. In this template, page dimensions, column number, column width, and font size are all preformatted to produce a poster that is readable from 6' away. I have also designed this template to possess a good amount of white space, which is critical for a readable poster. Try to resist the inevitable directives from your mentor to use this white space to cram in more background information or to include every single experiment you did. To encourage responsible use, the template contains a macro that will deliver a mild, usually non-lethal shock via your keyboard when white space is decreased below 35%.
![]() |
Invariably, you'll need to change the layout to accommodate the needs of your topic: if you would like to see some examples of how other people have modified or mangled this template, check Google. I would also recommend looking at the gallery of sample posters at PhDposters.com, especially the useful comments underneath each image. Try to keep your word count as low as possible to maximize the chance that viewers will actually read your poster: shoot for 800 words or less. This will be painfully difficult if you are attempting to fully document everything you have done in your life, but posters with too many words will cause viewers to just read your figures or, more likely, to avoid your poster altogether.
Layout
Unlike a manuscript, posters can (and should!) adopt a variety of layouts depending on the form of charts and photographs. As long as you maintain sufficient white space, keep column alignments logical, and provide clear cues to your readers how they should "travel" through your poster elements, you can get creative. Make your poster creative! As an example (illustrated below), perhaps you might want to demote the unimportant sections (that few people read) to the undesirable real estate at the bottom portion of your poster, freeing up the right-hand column area for your stunning Conclusions. This strategy might be especially valuable for portrait-style posters where the bottom part of the paper almost touches the floor.
![]() |
The trick to producing a great poster is to embrace the rough draft process. Rough drafts are especially crucial in deciding whether you need to cut/add text or resize figures or fonts, decisions that can entail many hours of fussing and gnashing of teeth. You should produce a rough draft at least one month before it is due, and then bribe six people (friends, strangers, etc.) to look at it when you are not present. Ask them to leave their suggestions on small Post-Its that you provide for them (e.g., as on poster shown below). Ask them to comment on word count, prose style, idea flow, figure clarity, font size, spelling, etc. Note that you can print a miniature version of your poster on letter-sized paper to get a very rough sense of impending layout challenges, but such a shrunken version is extremely hard to critique and you will lose friends if you ask them to do so.
![]() |
Another great way to solicit comments efficiently is to convert your poster to a jpg and upload it to Flickr.com, a free image-hosting site that is popular with photographers. Once the image is on your Flickr site, you can ask people to visit the poster image and to add electronic Post-It notes, or to make general comments. If you want to give this a try, please join my flickr group, "Pimp My Poster". Internet-based poster feedback is especially good if your commenters are far away. And if you have a poster draft that you're deeply embarrassed about, you can set the image's "privacy level" to "Just Friends" -- which makes it invisible to everyone but people you invite. (Meeting organizers: you can use Flickr to set up a "Group" for meeting attendees to encourage and facilitate poster sharing before and after conferences.)
![]() |
“Arts and crafts” posters
Please note that unless you possess artistic ability and don’t have anything else to do with your time, you should not attempt to build a poster by cutting and pasting content onto panels colored matte board, the default method for the most of the last century. Such “arts and crafts” posters, when properly executed, are far, far superior to anything that you could make with a poster printer, but they are not advisable for the busy and artistically challenged.
What sections to include and what to put in them
Title: Should convey the "issue," the approach, and the system (organism); needs to be catchy in order to "reel in" intoxicated passersby. [Maximum length: 1-2 lines.]
Abstract:Do not include an abstract on a poster! If you are presenting your poster at a meeting, you will probably be asked to submit an abstract; this abstract is for inclusion in the "meeting catalog," not for on your poster. If for some reason you are forced to include an Abstract section on your poster, please certainly abide by those rules, but consider asking the meeting organizer why on earth their society's guidelines are so silly. At the very least, don't make your abstract long: aim for 50 words or less.Introduction: Get your viewer interested about the issue or question while using the absolute minimum of background information and definitions (such things put a reader to sleep, which is dangerous if he or she is standing); quickly place your issue in the context of published, primary literature; provide description and justification of general experimental approach, and hint at why your study organism is ideal for such research; give a clear hypothesis. Please note that "X has never been studied before" is a classic but classically lame reason for doing something. Unlike a manuscript, the introduction of a poster is a wonderful place to put a photograph or illustration that communicates some aspect of your research question. [Maximum length: approximately 200 words.]
Materials and methods: Briefly describe experimental equipment and methods, but not with the detail used for a manuscript; use figures and tables to illustrate experimental design if possible; use flow charts (the type with text and drawings within boxes) to summarize reaction steps or timing of experimental procedures; include photograph or labeled drawing of organism; mention statistical analyses that were used and how they allowed you to address hypothesis. [Maximum length: approximately 200 words.]
Results: First, mention whether experiment worked (e.g., "90% of the birds survived the brainectomy"); in same paragraph, briefly describe qualitative and descriptive results (e.g., “surviving birds appeared to be lethargic and had difficulty locating seeds”); in second paragraph, begin presentation of data analysis that more specifically addresses the hypothesis; refer to supporting charts or images; provide extremely engaging figure legends that could stand on their own (i.e., could convey some point to reader if viewer skipped all other sections, which they usually do); place tables with legends, too, but opt for figures whenever possible. This is always the largest section, except if you have no data. [Maximum length: approximately 200 words, not counting figure legends.]
Conclusions: Remind (without sounding like you are reminding) the reader of hypothesis and result, and quickly state whether your hypothesis was supported; discuss why your results are conclusive and interesting (attempt to convince reader of these points); relevance of your findings to other published work; relevance to real organisms in the real world; future directions. [Maximum length: approximately 300 words.]
Literature cited: Follow standard biology format exactly (don't wing this!); web sites and rumors you heard at Starbucks are equally undesirable sources: find a journal article that supports your needed fact. Also, if you haven’t read a journal article completely (e.g., you could only view the abstract online) you may not cite it! [Maximum length: approximately 10 citations.]
Acknowledgments: Thank individuals for specific contributions to project (equipment donation, statistical advice, laboratory assistance, comments on earlier versions of the poster); mention who has provided funding; be sincere but do not lapse too much into informality in this section; do not list people's titles. Also include in this section explicit disclosures for any conflicts of interest and conflicts of commitment (more info). [Maximum length: approximately 40 words.]
Further information: There will be people, hopefully, who want to know more about your research, and you can use this section to provide your e-mail address, your web site address, and perhaps a URL where they can download a PDF version of the poster (edit so that URL is not blued or underlined). [Maximum length: approximately 20 words.]
Avoiding common mistakes
The number one mistake is to make your poster too long. Densely packed, high word-count posters are basically manuscripts pasted onto a wall, and attract only those viewers who are for some reason excited by manuscripts pasted onto walls. Posters with 800 words or less are ideal. For those who feel that their experiment somehow warrants an exception to this brevity advice (i.e., "everyone"), find a friend to help you edit, asking them, "What text, figure, or table could I possibly delete or modify?" To view your word count in Powerpoint, go to the File menu and select Properties.
Titles with colons: now even scientists are using them. Reason for popularity of colons: I don't know. Data: Lewiston and Hartley 2005.
Use a non-serif font (e.g., Helvetica) for title and headings and a serif font (e.g., Palatino) for body text (serif-style fonts are much easier to read at smaller font sizes).
Do not "bullet" or otherwise punctuate section headers. The use of a larger font size for headers, coupled with a simple “bolded” format, is sufficient for demarcating sections.
The width of text boxes should be approximately 40 characters (on average: 11 words per line). Lines that are shorter or longer are harder to read quickly (according to research!).
Avoid blocks of text longer than 10 sentences.
Whenever possible, use lists of sentences rather than blocks of text.
Use italics instead of underlining.
When using acronyms and numbers (e.g., ATP, 666) within the body of text, scale down the font size by a couple of points so that their sizes don't overpower the lowercase text, which they would do if you left them at the default size. Use of "small caps" will sometimes do the trick, but this effect varies with different fonts.
Set line spacing of all text to be exactly 1, in case you have used super- or subscripted text.
Do not trust the "tab" feature to insert the correct amount of space when you are indenting a paragraph (the default is usually too big). Set the tab amount manually, with the ruler.
Correct any errors in spacing wit hin and between _ words, especially before and after __italicized__text. Note that you can use a single space between sentences (the "double space" convention was needed for typewriters, and we are slow to lose the habit). Use the Search/Replace feature to globally “replace” all double spaces with single spaces, and to locate locations where too many spaces occur between words.
Opt for light backgrounds (left) so that you don't need to house them in boxes (right). [Tortoises drawn by my sister, Teal!]
Similarly, if you have a color sensitivity mutation and don't know it, you might inadvertently design posters that are difficult for wild types to interpret. Or just plain ugly. If you're curious, you can test your color perception online (and get your pulse elevated for free). For the litigious and fun-averse, please use the tepid version, instead. White males of European descent are especially encouraged to test themselves--they are disproportionately color deficient (see Keegan and Bannister 2004, below, for a likely consequence).
If you are creating images on the computer, note that screen color (RGB mode) is different than printed, mixed-ink mode (CYMK). If you want your image to print as you see it, avoid RGB (i.e., change the mode to CYMK in Photoshop).
Complete the entire poster on a single platform. Switching from PC to Mac or Mac to PC invites disaster, sometimes in the form of lost image files or garbled graph axes. Even if you are lucky enough to transfer content across platforms, switching in this way often creates printing problems in the future.
Graph titles are not appropriate for laboratory write-ups and manuscripts, but they are great for posters. Having short, informative titles helps to lead the viewer more effortlessly through your poster.
![]() |
If you can add miniature illustrations to any of your graphs (e.g., as above), do it! Visual additions help attract and inform viewers much more effectively than text alone. Tables benefit from this trick as well.
Most graphing applications automatically give your graph an extremely annoying key that you should quickly delete if you can directly label the different elements (as above). Interpreting keys is sometimes very difficult, and you should do anything in your power to make your graphs easy on the brain.
Acronyms and other shorthands for genotypes, strains, and the like are great when talking to yourself but are terrible for communicating with others. On your graphs, use general, descriptive terms that would make sense to somebody who is not familiar with your research area. You can always add the strain ID in parenthesis: "Control genotype (Col-0)".
Y-axis labels aligned horizontally are much, much easier to read, and should be used whenever space allows. Viewers with hypertrophied, inflexible neck musculature will be especially appreciative.
All graphs should have axis labels formatted in "sentence case" (not in "Title Case" and not in "ALL CAPS").
Never give your graphs colored backgrounds, grid lines, or boxes. If your graphing program gives them to you automatically, get rid of them, and curse the programmers as you do it.
Make sure that details on graphs and photographs can be comfortably viewed from 6 feet away. A common mistake is to assume that axes labels, figure legends, and numbers on axes are somehow exempt from font-size guidelines. On the contrary, most viewers will read only your figures!
Powerpoint does not allow "wrapping" of text around inserted figures, so if you want this option for a particular section, you need to construct the paragraph or section as a separate Microsoft Word file (which does allow text to wrap), and then insert this Word file into your Powerpoint poster by the menu command, Insert:Object (select the "create from file" option). When you want to change anything, you merely double-click the section and the Microsoft Word file will be called up, magically, for you to edit.
Never, ever incorporate "web" graphics without extreme caution. Most web images have 72 dots per inch of resolution, but printing at that resolution looks absolutely terrible, and the figure will be a huge turn-off to prospective viewers. And never, ever assume that your mentor has, or can find, a high-quality image to give you -- if they have anything, it is usually something pulled of the Internet. If you have access to a digital camera, use it to get a high quality photograph of your study setup or organism (e.g., your Drosophila mutant, a close-up of your Arabidopsis in flower). Memory space is cheap on a digital camera, so take 100 photographs to ensure that at least one has crisp detail, good composition, non-distracting background, etc. Sometimes to get the perfect shot you will need to seek out a microscope that has a camera attached to it. Run your best image through Photoshop to adjust contrast, image size, and sharpening. It should look professional when printed; if it does not, start over. If you're looking for a good generic photograph of something, I highly recommend searching through Flickr (http://www.flickr.com/); then you just send an e-mail to the owner and ask whether you can use his/her wonderful photograph in your poster, with proper credit of course).
Photograph with and without an added border
![]() |
![]() |
Swarthmore College logo (left) and seal (right). By the way, it is pronounced SwaRthmore, not SwaWthmore. Individuals failing to pronounce the "R" are "usually socially maladjusted, nonintegrated people whose lack of linuguistic accommodation to their peers is a sign of social pathology" (Trudgill, American Speech 74:227-239). The mispronounciation leads to mass misspelling of our College's name on the Internet. |
|
![]() |
Format your Literature cited contents according to the inflexible rules (all 1282.17 grams of them) that the Council of Biology Editors (CBE) has set forth. References that are only haphazardly formatted mark a poster as painfully unprofessional. When asking somebody to proof your poster, specifically ask them to be super-critical of your citation style. If your reference list becomes unusually long, you can sometimes shrink the font 3-4 points and then make a "2 column" citation list (but keep the section's header sized to match rest of poster).
Presenting your poster
Example of poster/wardrobe coordination. Please note that his tie features teeth and tooth care products.
PHOTO COURTESY (AND COPYRIGHT) NICOLE BARKER (AKA 'PIXIENIKI')
Do not wear a hat. Do not wear a muscle shirt. Etc.
Wear a name tag, if possible, so that viewers know that the poster belongs to you.
Do not chew gum or tobacco. A nicotine patch is fine, just don't affix it to your forehead (it's distracting, and can leave a nasty rash). Remember that too many nicotine patches can cause cardiac arrest.
Keep your hands out of your pockets, especially if you are a compulsive key or coin jangler. Fill your pockets with pushpins if you think you won't be able to resist. Don't do this if you are hemophiliac, though.
Do not refer to notes when explaining your poster.
Speak to your viewers as you explain your poster.
If visitor hasn't left or yawned, you might continue on to other figures. Point to specific parts of your poster whenever possible so that viewers are aware of your progression. Don't point to text and read it.
Avoid vagueness such as "this figure shows our main result."
Keep a black pen and correction fluid in your pocket in case a viewer discovers an embarrassing tybo.
If more viewers arrive halfway into your spiel, finish the tour for the earlier arrivals first.
When in doubt about how to act at your poster, imagine that a viewer will be considering your application for a job ten years into the future, or will be considering your graduate school application next week.
Bring a small coin envelope of business cards to attach to your poster (via pushpins, or via a binder clip). Students: you can print up a small stack of business cards for the event (use Powerpoint, or download a dedicated card-design application if you're a real geek). Glue one of the cards to the outside so that viewers know the contents, and write, "please take one," or something equally inviting. (Note: your institutional logo will be on your cards, so having this item will reduce the compulsion to place a logo on the actual poster.) Example.
If you must leave your poster, affix a note alerting any viewers to your expected time of return or telling them where you can be found (e.g., which bar).
Have on hand, but do not aggressively peddle, manuscripts and reprints of your work. Example.
Also have on hand full-color, "shrunken" versions of your poster on 8.5 x 11" paper. If you have resisted the urge to shrink your font size, the shrunken text will be legible. Example.
Useful literature
Block, S. 1996. The DOs and DON'Ts of poster presentation. Biophysical Journal 71:3527-3529.
Briscoe, M.H. 1996. Preparing Scientific Illustrations: A Guide to Better Posters, Presentations, and Publications, 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag, New York. [preview via Google Books]
Day, R.A. 2006. How To Write and Publish a Scientific Paper, 6th ed. Oryx Press, Phoenix. [Amazon]
Keegan, D.A., and S.L. Bannister. 2003. Effect of colour coordination of attire with poster presentation on poster popularity. Canadian Medical Association Journal 169:1291-1292.
Matthews, J.R., J.M. Bowen, and R.W. Matthews. 1996. Successful Science Writing: A Step-by-Step Guide for the Biological and Medical Sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. [preview via Google Books]
Pechenik, J.A. 2007. A Short Guide to Writing about Biology, 6th edition. HarperCollins College Publishers, New York. [Amazon]
Rigden, C. 1999. ‘The eye of the beholder’—designing for colour-blind users. British Telecommunications Engineering 17:2-6.
Tufte, E.R. 1983. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Graphics Press, Connecticut. [Amazon]
Wolcott, T.G. 1997. Mortal sins in poster presentations or, How to give the poster no one remembers. Newsletter of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology Fall:10-11.
Woolsey, J. D. 1989. Combating poster fatigue: how to use visual grammar and analysis to effect better visual communications. Trends in Neurosciences 12:325-332.
When you’re ready to print
Print to a PDF file first. Then examine the PDF file at full magnification to proof for color accuracy, pleasing font rendering, and crisp image detail. If the PDF looks awful, go back and fix your source file. Repeat process until you're too frustrated to go on in life, then print. If you don't own a poster printer, you can send your file to one of many online companies that print posters and then mail them to you (or to your meeting location). In some instances the conference organizers have pre-arranged collaborations with a printer service, so check with the people in charge before you choose a service. Here are several to consider:
The Powerpoint templates available on most of the sites above are beyond awful, so I suggest using the companies only for printing, not for design advice. Search “scientific posters pdf shipping site:com” (or something like that) on Google to get the names of more companies.
Using this site
No need to check with me to link to this site, or to use excerpts with attribution. It was created for students at Swarthmore College, but if it can help you teach poster design or help you create a poster, then go crazy. If you have suggestions for improvements, or have a good photograph of you next to your wonderful poster (I use them in talks), I'd love to hear from you. And if you'd just like to plagiarize some of my advice and pawn it off as your own, I can't really stop you. But I will methodically track down your kin and make them suffer terribly in the afterlife, if not sooner. I have my ways.
Meeting and conference organizers
In case you haven't noticed, many posters these days are absolutely terrible, and they are getting worse each year. So if you have a position of power in your society, please consider coming up with society-specific advice that might raise poster quality a bit. If nothing else, give some word count suggestions, and punish violators with pepper spray so that others take the rule more seriously. And if you are able to come up with useful guidelines and links, make sure the web page is mirrored on the society's permanent web page, not just on the temporary site associated with the year's meeting information. If you're interested, check out how some societies do this.
Citing this site
Purrington, C.B. 2006. Advice on designing scientific posters. http://www.swarthmore.edu/NatSci/cpurrin1/posteradvice.htm. Accessed [today's date].
Text, templates, and graphics copyright Colin Purrington
, 610-328-8621
CREATED 01.20.1997, LAST UPDATED:
05.06.2008
Visitors: